When I first switched to a raw food diet in 1995, agave syrup (also called agave nectar) was unknown. I first learned about it back in 1999 or 2000 at a trade show for the health food industry, which I attend regularly to keep up with the latest in the health and nutrition field. I asked several questions, got some samples, and asked how the company processed the agave syrup. At that time, I learned that it was processed at roughly 140 to 160 degrees Fahrenheit, so I certainly didn’t consider it a raw food by any means. Just like agave, some people consider maple syrup a raw food, but all maple syrup is heat-treated and is therefore not raw at all.

Unfortunately, there are no “raw labeling laws.” Anyone, anywhere, at any time can put “RAW” on their label and they may think it's raw since it is made from a “raw” material or not roasted. Just because it says “RAW” doesn’t necessarily mean that it was processed at a temperature under 118 degrees Fahrenheit, doesn't mean it still has all its enzymes, nutrients, and “life force” intact.

For example, it is my understanding that so-called “raw” carob powder has been heated to about 250 degrees, whereas “roasted” carob powder has been heated to about 450 degrees. The additional heat applied to the “roasted” carob powder causes the carob to “carmelize,” thus making it darker in appearance and different in taste as compared to the “raw” carob powder. Some stores sell “truly raw” carob powder, which has a chalkier texture than supposedly “raw” carob powder. There are some sources of the “truly raw” carob powder.

Along these lines, there are several raw food snack bars that say “RAW” but have ingredients such as cooked cocoa powder (that can’t be raw) and cashew nuts (most of which are not truly raw).

Let’s suppose, for argument's sake--and to give agave the benefit of the doubt--that with “new” technology, companies are somehow able to process agave syrup below 118 degrees so that it could be considered actually “raw”. We still need to ask the question: Is it good for us? Some foods, even if they are really raw, may not actually be healthy. Based on what I have learned about agave syrup, I believe it to be one of these foods.

My answer to the question, “Is agave nectar good for us?” would be “No” based on my research. Here is a sample of my findings:

Agave Syrup is not a “whole” food. It is a fractionated and processed food. Manufacturers take the liquid portion of the agave plant and “boil” it down, thus concentrating the sugar to make it sweet. This is similar to how maple “sap” that comes directly from a tree is heated and concentrated to make maple “syrup.” Agave Syrup is missing many of the nutrients that the original plant had to begin with. Agave Syrup was originally used to make tequila. When Agave Syrup ferments, it literally turns into tequila. The enzymatic activity therefore must be stopped so that the syrup will not turn into tequila in your cupboard. Raw or not, if there is no enzymatic activity, it is certainly not a “live” food. As Raw Foodists, we want the enzymes intact.

According to my research, there are three major producers of agave syrup. Some of these companies also have other divisions that make Tequila. For the most part, agave syrup is produced in the Guadalajara region in Mexico. There are those within the industry who I have spoken to at various trade shows who say that some of the agave syrup is “watered down” with corn syrup in Mexico before it is exported to the USA. Why is this done? Most likely because Agave Syrup is expensive, and corn syrup is cheap.

Agave Syrup is advertised as “low glycemic” and marketed towards diabetics. It is true that agave itself is low glycemic, due to the unusually high concentration of fructose (90 percent) compared to the small amount of glucose (10 percent). Nowhere in nature does this ratio of fructose to glucose occur naturally. One of the foods that contain almost this concentration of glucose to fructose is high fructose corn syrup, which may contain up to 80 percent fructose. Even though fructose is low on the glycemic index, there are numerous problems associated with the consumption of fructose in such high concentrations as found in concentrated sweeteners:

A. Fructose appears to interfere with copper metabolism. This causes collagen and elastin being unable to form. Collagen and elastin are connective tissue which essentially hold the body together. A deficiency in copper can also lead to bone fragility, anemia, defects of the arteries and bone, infertility, high cholesterol levels, heart attacks and--ironically enough--an inability to control blood sugar levels.

B. Research suggests that fructose actually promotes disease more readily than glucose. This is because glucose is metabolized by every cell in the body, and fructose must be metabolized by the liver. Tests on animals show that the livers of animals fed large amounts of fructose develop fatty deposits and cirrohosis of the liver. This is similar to what happens to the livers of alcoholics.

C. “Pure” isolated fructose contains no enzymes, vitamins or minerals, and may rob the body of these nutrients in order to assimilate itself for physiological use.

D. Fructose may contribute to diabetic conditions. It reduces the sensitivity of insulin receptors. Insulin receptors are the pathway glucose uses to enter cells to be metabolized. As a result, the body needs to make more insulin to handle the same amount of glucose.

E. Consumption of fructose has been shown to cause a significant increase in uric acid. An increase in uric acid can be an indicator of heart diease.

F. Fructose consumption has been shown to increase lactic acid, especially for people with conditions such as diabetes. Extreme elevations may cause metabolic acidosis.

G. Consuming fructose leads to mineral losses, especially the excretion of iron, magnesium, calcium and zinc, as compared to comsumption of sucrose.

H. Fructose may cause accelerated aging through oxidative damage. Scientists found that rats given fructose had more cross-linking changes in the collagen of their skin than other groups fed glucose. These changes are thought to be markers for aging.

I. Fructose can make you fat! It is metabolized by the liver and converts to fat more easily than any other sugar. Fructose also raises serum triglycerides (blood fats) significantly.

Agave Syrup and other concentrated sweeteners are addictive, so you end up trading an addiction to cooked foods (like candy bars or cookies) for an addiction to "raw" foods, which is not much better. Eating concentrated sweeteners makes it harder to enjoy the sweet foods we should be eating--whole fresh fruits, since most of them don’t seem as sweet by comparison.

Whole fruits generally contain a much smaller amount of fructose than sucrose and glucose. In addition, fruits contain vitamins, minerals, phytonutrients, fiber, and other nutrients. Our bodies are designed to digest a complete “package” of nutrition that appears in whole, fresh, ripe fruits.

Could nature be wrong? It’s always better to eat fruits whole or blend them rather than to juice them. When you juice fruits you remove the fiber that helps to slow down the absorption of the sugars. Concentrated sweeteners (such as agave) also contain no fiber and have much greater concentrations of simple sugars than are found in fresh fruit or even in fresh fruit juices.

Now that you have a better understanding about Agave Syrup, hopefully the companies selling “raw” agave won’t dupe you. They are out to make a buck, which in this case is unfortunately at the expense of your health. If you are making a “raw” recipe and it does require a concentrated sweetener, I have some recommendations for some better options to use instead of agave: (Listed in order of preference.)

1. Use ripe fresh fruits. Ripe fruits contain nutrients, fiber and water, a complete package, as nature intended. I find that ripe and organic fruits are usually sweetest.

2. Use fresh whole stevia leaves. Stevia is an herb that actually tastes sweet but contains no sugar. This herb can be very hard to find fresh, so I personally grow my own. If fresh leaves are not available, get the whole dried leaves or the whole leaf powder. Avoid the white stevia powder and the stevia liquid drops as they have been highly processed.

3. Use dried fruits. If you need a “syrup” consistency, just soak the dried fruits in some water and blend them up with the same soak water. Dates, figs, and prunes are some of the sweetest dried fruits that tend to work well in recipes. Try wet Barhi dates blended with a little water for an amazing maple syrup substitute. Please note that since there are no raw-food labeling standards, some dried fruit may be dried at higher than 118 degrees, and thus, is not really raw. If you want to ensure that you are eating really raw dried fruit, it is best do dehydrate it yourself.

4. Raw honey is a concentrated sweetener, and although I don't recommend it, in my opinion it is better than agave syrup because it is a whole food and occurs naturally in nature. Of course, honey is not vegan and that may be a concern for some. I recommend that if you do choose do use honey that you buy it from a local beekeeper.

Please note that the following “concentrated sweeteners” that are often seen in raw food recipes are NOT raw foods:

1) Maple Syrup, which is heat processed. In addition, if it is not organic, it may also contain formaldehyde and other toxic chemicals.

2) Sucanat or evaporated cane juice is pure dried sugar cane juice. This is processed at a temperature above 118 degrees and therefore can’t be considered raw.

3) Yacon Syrup is from the root of the yacon plant in South America. It is once again, a concentrated sweetener processed at a temperature of up to 140 degrees Farenheight.

The moral of this article: Eat whole fresh organic fruits and vegetables, because they are always best. Always question processed and concentrated foods that are not found in nature, even if they are “raw.”

References:

1. Fields, M., Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 1984, 175:530-537.

2. Klevay, Leslie, Acting Director of the U.S. Agriculture Department’s Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, N.D.

3. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2002 Vol. 76, No. 5, 911-922.

4. Appleton, Nancy Ph.D., Fructose is No Answer For a Sweetener, http://www.mercola.com/2002/jan/5/fructose.htm.

5. H. Hallfrisch, et al.,The Effects of Fructose on Blood Lipid Levels, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 37: 5, 1983, 740-748.

6. J. MacDonald, Anne Keyser, and Deborah Pacy, Some Effects, in Man, of Varying the Load of Glucose, Sucrose, Fructose, or Sorbitol on Various Metabolites in Blood, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31 (August 1978)): 1305-1311.

7. Hallfrisch, Judith, Metabolic Effects of Dietary Fructose, FASEB Journal 4 (June 1990): 2652-2660.

8. A. E. Bergstra, A. G. Lemmens, and A. C. Beynens, Dietary Fructose vs. Glucose Stimulates Nephrocalcinogenesis in Female Rats, Journal of Nutrition 123, no. 7 (July 1993): 1320-1327.

9. Roger B. Mc Donald, Influence of Dietary Sucrose on Biological Aging, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 62 (suppl), (1995): 284s-293s.

10. H. Hallfrisch, et al.,The Effects of Fructose on Blood Lipid Levels, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 37: 5, 1983, 740-748.

Note: About the Author

John Kohler has been on the living and raw foods diet for nearly a decade; he turned to living foods for healing from a life threatening-illness (spinal meningitis) and has enjoyed dynamic health ever since. One of John's goals is to educate the world about the power of living and raw foods. He founded www.living-foods.com in 1997 of which he is the webmaster, and is also the founder and webmaster of www.rawfoodsupport.com. He speaks at many raw food festivals and events, on such topics as appliances and gadgets, recipes with five-to-seven ingredients or less, young coconut recipes, traveling while raw, successful transition to the raw foods diet, and the importance of a fresh organic whole foods diet. He believes that by using fresh, organic, and whole ingredients, that simple, healthy, and delicious recipes can be made with few ingredients and without the use of salt, oil, spices, refined sweeteners or chemical additives. He is known for his pragmatic approach to raw foods and has helped thousands of people to incorporate more fresh raw fruits and vegetables into their diet. John is available for individual raw food coaching. He lives in Sonoma County, California.